Why do stable nuclei never have more protons than neutrons ?
Why do stable nuclei never have more protons than neutrons ?
Because if no. of protons is more than no. of neutrons then the excess repulsive force produced between the protons can not be counter balanced by less nuclear force between smaller no. of neutrons and so nucleus will become unstable.
Similar Questions
An alpha particle is projected towards a stationary ${}_{92}^{235}U$ nucleus with $KE$ kinetic energy find distance of closest approach
An alpha particle is projected towards a stationary ${}_{92}^{235}U$ nucleus with $KE$ kinetic energy find distance of closest approach
In beta decay
In beta decay
If radius of the $^{27}_{13}Al$ nucleus is taken to be $R_{Al}$, then the radius of $^{125}_{53}Te$ nucleus is nearly
If radius of the $^{27}_{13}Al$ nucleus is taken to be $R_{Al}$, then the radius of $^{125}_{53}Te$ nucleus is nearly
- [AIPMT 2015]
Two nucleons are at a separation of $1 \times {10^{ - 15}}m$. The net force between them is ${F_1}$, if both are neutrons, ${F_2}$ if both are protons and ${F_3}$ if one is a proton and other is a neutron. In such a case
Two nucleons are at a separation of $1 \times {10^{ - 15}}m$. The net force between them is ${F_1}$, if both are neutrons, ${F_2}$ if both are protons and ${F_3}$ if one is a proton and other is a neutron. In such a case
Two spherical nuclei have mass numbers $216$ and $64$ with their radii $R_1$ and $R _2$ respectively. The ratio, $\frac{R_1}{R_2}$ is equal to
Two spherical nuclei have mass numbers $216$ and $64$ with their radii $R_1$ and $R _2$ respectively. The ratio, $\frac{R_1}{R_2}$ is equal to
- [AIIMS 2015]